Lesson 6 · 40 min

Closing the Sizing Loop

All the ingredients are on the table: the crew and payload, the empty-weight trend, and a fuel fraction built from \(L/D\), \(C\) and the mission. This lesson puts them together and sizes the business jet, checks the answer, and then deals with a harder case: missions that drop part of their weight on the way.

Learning objectives

Sizing the business jet

Lessons 1 to 5 gave everything the sizing equation needs:

The business jet

\[ \Wo = \frac{980}{1 - 0.2867 - 0.9727\,\Wo^{-0.06}} \]

Crew and payload \(980\ \text{kg}\) (Lesson 1); fuel fraction 0.2867 (Lesson 5); jet-transport trend in kg (Lesson 2).

Example 6.1 — Iterate to convergence

Starting from \(10\,000\ \text{kg}\), iterate until \(\Wo\) changes by less than 1 kg. Then find the empty and fuel weights.

Show solution
Iterations
IterationGuess (kg)\(\We/\Wo\)New \(\Wo\) (kg)
110 0000.55986382
263820.57507088
370880.57146908
469080.57236951
569510.57216941
669410.57226943
769430.57216943
\[ \Wo = 6943\ \text{kg}, \qquad \We = 0.5721(6943) = 3972\ \text{kg}, \qquad \Wf = 0.2867(6943) = 1990\ \text{kg} \]

Check: \(980 + 1990 + 3972 = 6942\ \text{kg}\), equal to \(\Wo\) within rounding.

The guesses overshoot and undershoot, each time by less: the error shrinks by a factor of about 4 per iteration here. Convergence is fast because the empty-weight fraction changes slowly with weight. A spreadsheet does it in one column; the Sizing Calculator does it as you type.

Figure 6.1 The iteration, guess by guess, for the business jet and for the cargo-dropping transport of Example 6.2. Change the first guess: every guess converges to the same \(\Wo\), and the drop mission converges more slowly because its fuel depends on \(\Wo\) too.

Is the answer sensible?

A converged number is not necessarily a right one. Before going on:

Missions that drop payload

When a mission drops weight (bombs, cargo, sonobuoys, a fire-retardant load), the weight after the drop is not a fixed fraction of \(\Wo\): it is the weight before the drop minus a fixed number of kilograms. The fuel burned after the drop then depends on \(\Wo\), and the simple fuel fraction no longer exists. The remedy is to follow the weight through the mission:

  1. Guess \(\Wo\).
  2. Step through the segments: \(W_i = W_{i-1}(W_i/W_{i-1})\) for each flight segment, \(W_i = W_{i-1} - W_{\text{drop}}\) at the drop.
  3. The fuel burned is \(\Wo - W_{\text{drop}} - W_x\); add 6%: \(\Wf = 1.06(\Wo - W_{\text{drop}} - W_x)\).
  4. New \(\Wo = (W_{\text{crew}} + W_{\text{payload}} + \Wf)/(1 - \We/\Wo)\), with the payload including the dropped weight. Repeat.

Example 6.2 — Air-dropping cargo

A twin-turboprop transport (the twin-turboprop trend, \(\We/\Wo = 0.9228\,\Wo^{-0.05}\) in kg) with a crew of 3 (\(270\ \text{kg}\)) carries \(6000\ \text{kg}\) of cargo \(1000\ \text{km}\), air-drops it, and returns. Mission: takeoff 0.970, climb 0.985, cruise \(1000\ \text{km}\) (fraction 0.92867), drop, cruise \(1000\ \text{km}\) back (0.92867), 30-minute loiter (0.98474), landing 0.995. (The cruise and loiter fractions use \(\LDmax = 14\), \(c_P = 0.5\) and \(0.6\ \text{lb/(hp h)}\), \(\eta_p = 0.8\).) Size it, and compare with the same aircraft bringing the cargo back.

Show solution

At the converged \(\Wo = 23\,897\ \text{kg}\), following the weight:

\[ W_3 = 23\,897(0.970)(0.985)(0.92867) = 21\,204\ \text{kg} \] \[ W_4 = 21\,204 - 6000 = 15\,204\ \text{kg} \] \[ W_x = 15\,204(0.92867)(0.98474)(0.995) = 13\,835\ \text{kg} \] \[ \Wf = 1.06(23\,897 - 6000 - 13\,835) = 4306\ \text{kg} \] \[ \frac{\We}{\Wo} = 0.9228(23\,897)^{-0.05} = 0.5574 \] \[ \Wo = \frac{270 + 6000 + 4306}{1 - 0.5574} = 23\,897\ \text{kg} \ \checkmark \]

From a guess of \(20\,000\ \text{kg}\) the iteration takes about ten steps (Figure 6.1). If the cargo stayed aboard, the ordinary fuel fraction would apply, \(1.06(1 - 0.970 \cdot 0.985 \cdot 0.92867^2 \cdot 0.98474 \cdot 0.995) = 0.2042\), and \(\Wo = 26\,040\ \text{kg}\): flying home empty saves 2.1 t of takeoff weight.

Check your understanding

Key takeaways