Lesson 3 · 40 min
Estimating L/D from the Sketch
The Breguet equations need a lift-to-drag ratio, but there is no drag analysis yet: only a sketch. Fortunately, the sketch already holds the two numbers that matter most, the span and the wetted area. Together with a skin-friction coefficient typical of the class, they give an \(\LDmax\) good enough to size the aircraft, long before a full drag build-up is possible.
Learning objectives
- Estimate the wetted area of wings, tails and fuselage from a sketch.
- Estimate \(\CDz\) with the equivalent skin-friction method, \(\CDz = C_{fe}\Swet/\Sref\).
- Compute the wetted aspect ratio and \(\LDmax = \tfrac12\sqrt{\pi e A_{\text{wet}}/C_{fe}}\).
- Choose the \(L/D\) for cruise and loiter for jet and propeller aircraft.
Wetted area from the sketch
Zero-lift drag at subsonic speeds is mostly skin friction, so it grows with the area the air touches: the wetted area \(\Swet\). Quick estimates come from the views of a sketch:
Wetted area (quick approximations)
\[ \text{Wings and tails:}\ \ \Swet \approx S_{\text{exposed}}\left(1.977 + 0.52\,\tfrac{t}{c}\right) \] \[ \text{Fuselage:}\ \ \Swet \approx 3.4\,\frac{A_{\text{top}} + A_{\text{side}}}{2} \]\(S_{\text{exposed}}\) is the planform area outside the fuselage; a little more than twice this area is wetted (top and bottom, plus a thickness correction). \(A_{\text{top}}\) and \(A_{\text{side}}\) are the projected areas of the fuselage in the top and side views. Add nacelles, pods and external stores the same way.
(a) Exposed planform
Area outside the fuselage, in the top view
(b) Wing or tail section
Both sides wetted, plus a little for thickness
(c) Fuselage views
Projected areas of the top and side views
Example 3.1 — The business jet's wetted area
The sketch shows a wing of \(\Sref = 28\ \text{m}^2\) and aspect ratio 8, of which 85% is exposed, with \(t/c = 0.12\); exposed tails of \(6.0\ \text{m}^2\) (horizontal) and \(4.5\ \text{m}^2\) (vertical) with \(t/c = 0.10\); a fuselage \(14\ \text{m}\) long and \(1.8\ \text{m}\) in diameter whose top and side views each cover 85% of the bounding rectangle; and two nacelles of \(6\ \text{m}^2\) wetted area each. Find the total wetted area and \(\Swet/\Sref\).
Top view
Side view
- Wing: \(\Sref = 28\ \text{m}^2\), \(A = 8\), 85% exposed, \(t/c = 0.12\)
- Tails: \(6.0 + 4.5\ \text{m}^2\) exposed, \(t/c = 0.10\)
- Fuselage: \(14 \times 1.8\ \text{m}\), each view 85% of the rectangle
- Nacelles: two, \(6\ \text{m}^2\) wetted each
Show solution
| Component | \(\Swet\) (m²) | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Wing | 48.5 | 31% |
| Tails | 21.3 | 14% |
| Fuselage | 72.8 | 47% |
| Nacelles | 12.0 | 8% |
| Total | 154.7 | 100% |
Almost half the wetted area of a business jet is fuselage: a small aircraft must still have a cabin people can sit in. That is one reason small jets have lower \(L/D\) than airliners.
Zero-lift drag: the equivalent skin friction
Real aircraft have more drag than flat-plate skin friction alone: form drag, interference, gaps, antennas, leakage. These are all lumped into an equivalent skin-friction coefficient \(C_{fe}\), measured on existing aircraft of each type:
Equivalent skin-friction method
\[ \CDz = C_{fe}\,\frac{\Swet}{\Sref} \]| Type of aircraft | \(C_{fe}\) |
|---|
Light aircraft have higher \(C_{fe}\) than airliners: fixed landing gear, exposed engines, less careful finish and, above all, a lower Reynolds number, at which skin friction is higher.
The wetted aspect ratio
Substitute \(\CDz = C_{fe}\Swet/\Sref\) into Module 1's \(\LDmax = \tfrac12\sqrt{\pi A e/\CDz}\), with \(A = b^2/\Sref\). The reference area cancels:
Maximum \(L/D\) from the sketch
\[ A_{\text{wet}} = \frac{b^2}{\Swet} = \frac{A}{\Swet/\Sref}, \qquad \LDmax = \frac12\sqrt{\frac{\pi e\,\colL{A_{\text{wet}}}}{C_{fe}}} \]Span gives lift efficiently (induced drag falls with \(b^2\)); wetted area costs friction drag. Their ratio is what matters. Take \(e\) about 0.75 to 0.85 for a first estimate (Module 9 estimates it properly).
Plotted against \(A_{\text{wet}}\), the \(\LDmax\) of real aircraft falls in a band for each class, and a first estimate can be read off the band. The formula above is the physics behind those bands; it is a little optimistic because it ignores trim, compressibility and the drag of things the sketch does not show, so many designers take a few percent off.
Example 3.2 — The business jet's \(L/D\)
With \(A = 8\), \(\Swet/\Sref = 5.5\), \(C_{fe} = 0.0030\) (civil transport) and \(e = 0.75\), find \(A_{\text{wet}}\), \(\CDz\), \(\LDmax\), and the \(L/D\) to use in cruise.
Show solution
A jet gets its best range at \(L/D = 0.866\,\LDmax\) (Module 1, Lesson 6), so cruise uses \(0.866(16.9) = 14.6\). The 45-minute loiter reserve uses \(\LDmax = 16.9\).
Which \(L/D\) for cruise and loiter
An aircraft does not fly every segment at \(\LDmax\). What it maximizes depends on how its fuel consumption varies with speed:
| Engine | Cruise (best range) | Loiter (best endurance) |
|---|---|---|
| Jet | \(0.866\,\LDmax\) | \(\LDmax\) |
| Propeller | \(\LDmax\) | \(0.866\,\LDmax\) |
A jet burns fuel in proportion to thrust, so it loiters where drag is least (\(\LDmax\)) and cruises a little faster, where speed times \(L/D\) is greatest. A propeller engine burns fuel in proportion to power, drag times speed, so it cruises at \(\LDmax\) and loiters slower, where power is least, at \(0.866\,\LDmax\). Lesson 4 shows why from the fuel consumption.
Check your understanding
Key takeaways
- Wings and tails: \(\Swet \approx S_{\text{exposed}}(1.977 + 0.52\,t/c)\); fuselage: \(\Swet \approx 3.4(A_{\text{top}} + A_{\text{side}})/2\).
- \(\CDz = C_{fe}\Swet/\Sref\), with \(C_{fe}\) about 0.0030 for transports and 0.0055 for light singles.
- \(A_{\text{wet}} = b^2/\Swet\) and \(\LDmax = \tfrac12\sqrt{\pi e A_{\text{wet}}/C_{fe}}\).
- Jets cruise at \(0.866\,\LDmax\) and loiter at \(\LDmax\); propeller aircraft the other way round.
- Next, Lesson 4 estimates the propulsive ingredient, \(C\).