Lesson 2 · 40 min

Where Requirements Come From

"Design an airplane" is not a design problem. "Carry 150 passengers 5000 km at Mach 0.78 from a 2000 m runway, at a lower cost per seat than today's aircraft" is. This lesson shows who sets numbers like these, what kinds of requirements there are, how to write one that can be checked, and how a few of the most important numbers are worked out from a market, a map and an airport.

Learning objectives

Who sets the requirements

Customers

A military customer states a need and issues a request for proposal (RFP) with numbered requirements. Airlines rarely write formal specifications; instead a manufacturer works with launch customers to agree on the seats, range and economics before committing to a new type.

The market

Market studies forecast traffic on city pairs, the age of fleets that need replacing and what competitors will offer. They decide the size (seats or payload) and the range that will sell the most aircraft, often as a family of sizes.

Regulators and infrastructure

Airworthiness rules (Lesson 4), operating rules such as fuel reserves (Lesson 6), noise and emissions limits, and the airports themselves: runway lengths, gate sizes and wingspan limits.

The manufacturer adds its own requirements: use an engine that exists, share parts with an earlier model, reach a target price, or leave room to stretch the fuselage later. These company requirements can be as decisive as the customer's.

Kinds of requirements

Typical requirements for a new transport aircraft, with examples
KindExamples
MissionDesign payload (150 passengers with bags), design range (5000 km with reserves), cruise Mach number (0.78), cruise altitude; for military aircraft, combat radius, loiter time, weapons carried
Field and climb performanceTakeoff field length at maximum weight on a hot day, landing field length, one-engine-out climb gradient, time to climb, initial cruise altitude
Maneuver (military)Sustained turn load factor, specific excess power, acceleration time
CertificationThe certification basis (FAR or CS Part 25, for example), and everything it implies: safety, structural margins, systems redundancy
CompatibilityWingspan for the airport gates, door sill heights for ground equipment, runway pavement loading, turnaround time, cargo containers
EconomicPrice, fuel burn per seat, direct operating cost, maintenance cost, dispatch reliability, first delivery date
EnvironmentalNoise at certification points, emissions of nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide

Notice that only the first two rows are "aircraft design" in the textbook sense. Real programs are as often won or lost on the others.

Writing a requirement that can be checked

A requirement is only useful if, at the end, someone can show that the aircraft meets it. Good requirements are specific (one thing each), measurable (a number with a unit), state the conditions (weight, altitude, temperature, configuration) and are verifiable by analysis, test or inspection. They are written with "shall".

Weak and better versions of the same requirements
WeakBetter
The aircraft should have a short takeoff.The takeoff field length shall not exceed 2100 m at maximum takeoff weight, sea level, ISA + 15 °C.
Long range with good fuel efficiency.The aircraft shall carry 150 passengers at 100 kg each over 5000 km with international fuel reserves.
Fit at existing airports.The wingspan shall be less than 36 m (ICAO aerodrome code C).

Military requirements often give two values. The threshold is the minimum acceptable; the objective is what the customer would like, if it is affordable. A combat radius might have a threshold of 900 km and an objective of 1100 km. The gap between them is where trade studies (Lesson 7) do their work.

Top-level requirements are then broken down into derived requirements for each part of the aircraft. "Takeoff in 2100 m" becomes, after analysis, a maximum wing loading and a minimum thrust-to-weight ratio (Lesson 4 shows one way), and eventually a maximum lift coefficient for the flap designers to achieve.

From a market to a size

Suppose a market study says a route carries \(Q\) passengers a day in each direction, and the airline wants \(n\) departures a day each way (frequency sells tickets: business travellers want a flight when they need one). With an average load factor \(LF\), the fraction of seats filled, the number of seats each aircraft needs, or the number of departures for an aircraft of a given size, follows from the demand:

Seats and departures

\[ \text{seats} = \frac{Q}{n\,LF}, \qquad n = \frac{Q}{\text{seats}\times LF} \]

Round \(n\) up. The fleet needed follows from the time each round trip takes, \(2(t_{\text{block}} + t_{\text{turn}})\), and the hours a day each aircraft can fly.

Example 2.1 — How big, and how many?

A route carries \(1800\) passengers a day each way. (a) With 8 departures a day and a load factor of 0.80, how many seats does each aircraft need? (b) With a 180-seat aircraft instead, how many departures are needed? (c) Each flight takes \(2.5\ \text{h}\) block to block, the turnaround takes \(45\ \text{min}\), and each aircraft can operate \(17\ \text{h}\) a day. How many 180-seat aircraft does the route need?

Show solution
\[ \text{(a) seats} = \frac{1800}{8(0.80)} = 281 \] \[ \text{(b) } n = \frac{1800}{180(0.80)} = 12.5 \ \Rightarrow\ 13\ \text{departures a day each way} \]

(c) A round trip takes \(2(2.5 + 0.75) = 6.5\ \text{h}\), so each aircraft can fly \(\lfloor 17/6.5 \rfloor = 2\) round trips a day. Thirteen round trips need \(\lceil 13/2 \rceil = 7\) aircraft (plus spares for maintenance).

The airline's choice between (a) and (b) is a real trade: fewer, larger aircraft have a lower cost per seat; more frequent, smaller ones attract more passengers. Market studies of many such routes give the seat count that suits the most airlines.

From a map to a design range

Aircraft fly (approximately) along great circles, the shortest paths on the sphere. For two airports at latitudes \(\phi_1, \phi_2\) (north positive) and longitudes \(\lambda_1, \lambda_2\) (east positive), the central angle \(\theta\) between them and the distance are

Great-circle distance (spherical law of cosines)

\[ \cos\theta = \sin\phi_1\sin\phi_2 + \cos\phi_1\cos\phi_2\cos(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1), \qquad d = R_E\,\theta \]

\(R_E = 6371\ \text{km}\) (mean radius of the Earth) and \(\theta\) in radians. One nautical mile is \(1.852\ \text{km}\), about one minute of arc. Airlines and manufacturers quote ranges in nautical miles.

Example 2.2 — Ottawa to London

Ottawa airport (YOW) is at \(45.32^\circ\text{N}\), \(75.67^\circ\text{W}\); London Heathrow (LHR) at \(51.47^\circ\text{N}\), \(0.45^\circ\text{W}\). Find the great-circle distance in km and nautical miles.

Show solution

West longitudes are negative: \(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1 = -0.45 - (-75.67) = 75.22^\circ\).

\[ \cos\theta = \sin 45.32^\circ\sin 51.47^\circ + \cos 45.32^\circ\cos 51.47^\circ\cos 75.22^\circ \] \[ \cos\theta = 0.5562 + 0.4380(0.2551) = 0.6680 \] \[ \theta = 48.09^\circ = 0.8393\ \text{rad}, \qquad d = 6371(0.8393) = 5347\ \text{km} = 2887\ \text{nmi} \]

The route bulges north of the straight line on a flat map, toward Ireland: Figure 2.1 shows the curve.

A manufacturer does this for every city pair in its target market and sets the design range to cover the routes that matter, often 90% or more of them, with an allowance for winds, routings and reserves (Lesson 6). Range beyond what the market needs is paid for on every flight in fuel and weight (Lesson 7), so the choice is not "as much as possible".

Figure 2.1 Great-circle routes from a chosen airport to 25 others, drawn on a map with a latitude–longitude grid (a flat map, so the shortest routes look curved). Routes within the design range are drawn in green. Choose an origin and set the design range to see which markets an aircraft can serve nonstop, before any allowance for winds and reserves.

From an airport to a wingspan

Airports are designed around classes of aircraft. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) gives each a code letter by wingspan, which sets taxiway widths, separation and gate sizes. An aircraft that is too wide for the code of the gates it must use is a problem for every airline that buys it.

ICAO aerodrome reference code letters by wingspan
CodeWingspanExamples

A span limit is an aspect-ratio limit. Since \(A = b^2/S\), a wing of area \(S\) that must fit span \(b_{\max}\) has \(A \le b_{\max}^2/S\). That matters, because induced drag, and so cruise \(L/D\), improves with aspect ratio. Boeing's answer on the 777X was a folding wingtip: about 72 m in flight, about 65 m (code E) at the gate.

Example 2.3 — The code C box

A narrow-body airliner has a wing area of \(122\ \text{m}^2\) and must fit code C gates. What is the largest aspect ratio it can have?

Show solution
\[ A \le \frac{b_{\max}^2}{S} = \frac{36^2}{122} = 10.6 \]

(Strictly, the span must be less than 36 m.) Today's narrow-bodies have aspect ratios a little below this, with winglets that recover some of the induced drag a longer span would have saved. A larger wing area, needed by a heavier stretch, lowers the limit further.

Figure 2.2 Wingspans of transport aircraft against year: Loftin's transports (circles) and a few later aircraft from their published specifications (diamonds), with the ICAO code limits. The calculator gives the largest aspect ratio a wing of a chosen area can have within a code.

Check your understanding

Key takeaways